In Articles 2 (b) and Q 34 of the investigation, the joint intention was that the resident of the place, 15 km away from the location of the incident, suspected his presence at this time, as he was there at the time of the incident. There was no reason the presence of other witnesses was suspicious as medical evidence was opposed. The account that defied the witnesses' presence at the scene was made 9/2 hours after the appearance of the prosecution's story. It was suspected that the retrieval of the 222 bore rifle from the accused was unnecessary as no crime was recovered from it. There was no positive mail matching record, no recovery was received from both the accused, the page discrimination story was suspicious, statements of relevant and non-witnesses could not be taken into account, unless confirmed by independent evidence. There was a lack of evidence in this case, as there was no evidence to show that the FIR was executed with delays that were not explained, even postmortem was conducted with unspecified delays, many in the prosecution's story. There were doubts, suspects were allowed to increase their suspicion, appeals were allowed and the sentence passed by the trial court and The conviction was set aside, the accused were acquitted and released, under circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
