Section 22 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Delay of Section 5 Appeal Delay Reason sufficient pre-conditions Appellants claimed that the lawyer representing them informed them of the approval of the judgment and decision of the Banking Court against them. To gain the benefit of the section. 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, it was the duty of the appellants to specify the delay which went beyond the period allowed by the law for filing the appeal, sufficient reason for the exercise of discretion under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Was the condition of existence. One of the reasons that was beyond the control of the party to help with Section 5 of the Demarcation Act, 1908, was the delay which caused, with caution and attention, the party could avoid it, whether there was any reason or not. The trial was sufficient to see if it could be avoided by exercising proper care and attention from the party. Whether this was a valid reason and nothing was considered to be of benefit or with good faith that was not done with proper care and attention, the appellant failed to file a delay in filing the appeal. Was excluded under these circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
