Find a Lawyer

DR. MUHAMMAD MUZZAFFAR versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN MINISTRY OF PORT AND SHIPPING

Article 199 Removal of the Constitution Petition The back-in-petition applicant was a Port Trust employee, and was removed from the job after being discharged without leave, but the petition sought to recover the previous benefits on that basis. During this period, when he was unemployed while he was away from work, he was being considered for the restoration of the valedictorian petitioner. Was treated and accepted by the applicant as a result of which he could not turn This claim could not have been approved petition to consider a holiday without the benefit of the salary, under the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court refused to intervene in the case. r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• Mst. KHALIDA KHATOON v. ASKARI BANK LIMITED 2012 CLD 194
• RAJA QURESHI v. CHAIRMAN, ARBITRATION COUNCIL, CANTONMENT BOARD, KARACHI 2012 PLD 195
• Mst. ZUBAIDA SULTANA v. FIRST WOMEN BANK LTD. 2012 PCrLJ 202
• REHAN AHMED v. Mrs. NADRA ISRAR 2012 PLD 203
• MUHAMMAD SALMAN AHMED SIDDIQUI v. State 2012 YLR 206
• Mrs. INGRID PEREIRA v. VITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI SOUTH 2012 PLD 208
• ABDUL RASHEED v. State 2012 PCrLJ 210
• ASIF v. State 2012 YLR 211

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

list of advocates from Khushal Kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes