Find a Lawyer

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN versus APOLLO TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED

The statement of accounts for the defense of suit against Section 9 (2) and 10 bank loan recovery was not filed by the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance, Section 9 (2) of section 2001 and the times authorized. Validity Bank broke not only this but also the account statements, not only in it but in the body of the plaintiff, and it also met the requirements of Section 9 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001, as required. The information was clearly communicated to the defendants. Defendants raised facts in the petition for defense of leave that required recording of leave was required for which leave was required Defendants also confessed their lies Bible and no case was made for leave requests. Was rejected under the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• ZAHID ALI v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION PATNI, TALUKA ROHRI, DISTRICT SUKKUR 2012 PCrLJ 180
• M.S. PORT SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. v. PORT QASIM AUTHORITY 2012 PLD 182
• ALI ANWAR v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Revenue Department, Hyderabad 2012 YLR 183
• Mst. GHAZALA REHMAN v. NAJMA SULTANA 2012 MLD 188
• Syed PARYAL SHAH v. BEHRAM ALI 2012 PCrLJ 189
• SAUD NASIR QURESHI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary 2012 PLC(CS) 192
• Mst. KHALIDA KHATOON v. ASKARI BANK LIMITED 2012 CLD 194
• RAJA QURESHI v. CHAIRMAN, ARBITRATION COUNCIL, CANTONMENT BOARD, KARACHI 2012 PLD 195

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

immigration advocate from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes