Sections 9, 10 and 22 Appeal for Bank Loan Receipt Not Appealed for Leave to Defend Sue Banking Court Appeals Court to Defend Trial After the settlement of the decision and the decision was passed in favor of the bank. The bank should have first presented the bill for clearance to the foreign buyers and if it had been defamed, then the case could have been filed that had not been raised on the appeal by the defendants nor argued before the banking court. However, such an application cannot be allowed. The fact that the High Court was before the Plaintiff was realistic and the Banking Court failed to appreciate and discover if bills for payment were made by the bank and if it was dishonored or not. If this was the case, then this case could have gone on. No such petition has been filed on leave of appreciation of the petition, nor can any of its justifications be made possible by the decision of the High Court and the order passed by the Banking Court was legal, factual and trial. Consistent with the circumstances and did not demand any interference. The High Court refused to cancel the banking court results
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
