MUHAMMAD AYUB THROUGH LAWFUL ATTORNEY versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Sections 3 (1) (d), 9 and 11 of the Arms Rules, 1924, ARI 33, 41A, 42 (3) (6), Form XVI and XVI A constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 constitutional petition in the words of arms license In section 9, the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 by-issue and the cancellation of the National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA), the applicant's complaint is that the Federal Government has already revoked the arms license issued under the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965. And NADRA had no authority to issue computerized licenses, under Rule 42 (3) (b) of the Arms Rules, 1924, licenses issued under Form XVI and XVI A Renewed to the post office, including Ness, where he was registered under Rule 41A. The Arms Rules, 1924, and both rules were still in force and there was no such provision for registration and / or renewal by the Post Office in the computerized card license, thus, such a contrary to the Arms Rules, 1924, and Form PR. According to the rules made under the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, which still exists, without modifying Rule 41A of 1924, the arms license cannot be registered or renewed by any other authority or agency. In addition to the post office where the license is based on the words mentioned in Section 9 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 The clause was entered, which means that any weapon or license to occupy or control any ammunition or military store must be in the form prescribed by the rules, except, under the rules, the rules No other method was suggested or recommended under the same rules as in the rules
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
