Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MITHAL ALIAS IMAM BUX versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 337H (2) and 34 Convicted AMD and bail from hurried and negligent act, grant of further investigation neither the accused's name nor The details of this were the FIRs of the complainant and the accused were the followers of the caste. Three days later no identity parade was held, and even the unknown suspect had no role. Further investigations, under the circumstances, allowed to request a bail

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• SHAHI TEXTILES v. HABIB BANK LIMITED 2012 CLD 506
• Haji RIAZ AHMED v. HABIB BANK LIMITED 2012 CLC 507
• TALIB v. State 2012 YLR 509
• ABDUL WAHEED v. State 2012 MLD 510
• NAVAID AHMED SIDDIQUI v. OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE 2012 PLD 522
• SHAFI MUHAMMAD BHANGWAR v. State 2012 PLD 527
• INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN v. ABDUL LATIF CHANNA 2012 PCrLJ 528
• KHALIQUE v. State 2012 YLR 530

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

criminal advocate from Ghotki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes