INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN versus ABDUL LATIF CHANNA
Section 195 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Appeal Against Section 265 K & 417 Eviction filed by three respondents under Section 265, Banking Court alleges that machinery / plant for acquiring CRPC The person for whom the loan was provided, was missing and the mortgaged property was leased to someone else, alleging finance misconduct and directed against a bank respondent to remove the machinery / plant. Claiming that this is an accepted position. Was obtained by three respondents and was responsible for the criminal offense. Under the law, ineligibility to obtain a loan and repayment was not a criminal offense, it may be a civil obligation to take action in a civil forum provided under the law, but a default commission on repayment of debt, a criminal offense Will not give birth to machinery / plant which was alleged to have directed criminal proceedings against only respondents against one respondent, although action is taken against the remaining respondents, The purpose cannot be presented. Since there was no possibility of his punishment in the circumstances of the case
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
