Section 497 (2) of the Sindh Public Property (Elimination of Prohibition) Act (XVIII of 2010), Section 8 (1) of the encroachment on the boundary wall enclosure building, granting further investigation grants that the complainant identified Refused to do so when it was produced for identification and an FIR was lodged on the basis of the evidence at the hearing; the defendant was neither present at the time of the raid nor was there any harmful object in his possession. Was recovered, charged under section 8 (1). The Sindh Public Property (Termination of Extensions) Act, 2010, which was punished with a minimum sentence of one year, did not bring the accused to trial under section 497, CRPC prohibition clause, and registered four The day's blaze was delayed. The FIR prosecution story could not be released without a doubt and further investigation into the case requires the accused to be released on bail \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
