Section 497 of the control of the Narcotic Sub-Maturity Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (C) and 5I, was allegedly designated in the FIR on the basis of the alleged detective's information, despite the opportunity Nothing was recovered from it. As he was surrounded by a spat bag, the FIR did not say how the police had identified the accused in the parentage case against the accused. Nevertheless, there was the power to guarantee. Under the aforesaid clause under Section 51 of the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act, 1997, it was attracted only when reasonable grounds for the defendant to be convicted of the alleged offense could be made only when the quantity of the prohibited material was known. That was the case. There was no sufficient basis for the accused to provide sufficient evidence to understand that the accused was involved in the alleged crime.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
