ABDUL QADDUS KASHIF versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY LIVE STOCK AND DAIRY DEVELOPMENT (L&DD), PUNJAB, LAHORE
Article 199 After the extension of the contract of employment in the civil service, the applicant terminated the authority orders under which his representation for the employment was terminated after the expiry of the contract of employment. Of the employment contracts, he was reinstated in the job, but the applicant's assertion was not correct that after the initial contract was terminated, the applicant himself chose not to continue his services with the department, leaving the employees with their own Was asked to continue the duties. After their contracts expired, the applicant did not bother to contact the department office. The applicant has shown slowness and non-interest in the matter. The applicant submitted the application to the competent authority for extension of his contract after more than nine months. Ben's opportunity was heard by the applicant's authority case, not equivalent to other employees, and his representation was rightly rejected by the authority The constitutional application was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
