Sections 302 (b) and 364 of the evidence, the testimony of the suspect, the benefit of the doubt no more than 24 hours delay in reporting the case to the accused that the victim had been forced or fraudulent. The place, which was about 24km from the complainant's residence, complainant's story that when he arrived at the scene of the incident, the accused and his accomplices were hiding the body, did not complain. No witnesses, but he claimed that he was reported by two people, that one of the two people did not appear and the other person's statement could not be relied upon because he was not a resident of the area where the incident took place. Was. In the circumstances, there was a chance witness, his testimony was highly unlikely Stack was captured as an offensive weapon, but the complainant admitted that the stick was on the supply when he was there. In the absence of the details of this stick, which was not blood-stained, it can be pointed out that, as a general stock, it can be easily purchased from any location or the recovery of a stick in the market, In the circumstances, the prosecution had no benefit, which was not proven, it was not denied, and involved four others. One of them was charged, who was not tried and released by the police, the other person was absconding, while the other two were tried and acquitted. The evidence to the extent that the accused was acquitted, which was denied, cannot be ascertained at this time, unless there is an ad hoc basis for the evidence.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
