Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus MUHAMMAD JAHANGIR

A. XVIII, Rr 8, 14 and O XLI, R 23 Referring to the matter by the appellate court in the presence of the court, in the presence of their lawyer in the supervision of the judge under the supervision of the judge. Such error by the trial court for recording the parties' new evidence cannot be construed as illegal in the absence of prejudice which could result in such party's or such record's error. The re-recording of evidence at intervals will give them the opportunity to fill millions in this matter. Set aside the unclean order of remand, the appellate court directed them to decide on the merit within the stipulated period.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• Mst. ZEENAT BIBI v. MUHAMMAD HAYAT 2012 CLC 837
• Rana ZAHEER AHMAD v. State 2012 YLR 838
• SADIQ WAQAS v. State 2012 PCrLJ 841
• ABDUL MAJEED v. State 2012 YLR 841
• ABDUL QADDUS KASHIF v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary Live Stock and Dairy Development (L&DD), Punjab, Lahore 2012 PLC(CS) 846
• REGIONAL MANAGER, ADAMJEE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. PRESIDING OFFICER, DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, LAHORE 2012 CLD 846
• IQBAL HUSSAIN SHAH v. State 2012 PCrLJ 848
• SHAHID AKHTAR v. SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE 2012 PLC(CS) 851

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

law firms from Choa Saiden Shah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes