Sections 2 (n), 7 (e) and 23 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 365 and 365 of a Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Section 154 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition for Abduction and Abduction Act Terrorism FIR N FIR After the completion of the trial, the anti-terrorism court's objection concluded that the terrorism offense had not been proved, therefore, upon submission to the competent jurisdiction court. The challan was returned, the purpose of filing an FIR was simply to begin the process. During the investigation of the law, after recording the statements of the alleged kidnappers and the relevant prosecutor's witnesses, the prosecutor established his case that the defendant continued to claim ransom from the kidnappers and the relevant prosecutor's witnesses during his illegal detention. Is. The Anti Terrorism Act, 1997, which was specifically heard by the Anti Terrorism Court as set forth in the Anti Terror Schedule. The Anti-Terrorism Court was subjected to misunderstanding by the Anti-Terrorism Court, 1997, when the High Court directed the Anti-Terrorism Court to deny jurisdiction in the absence of an Act or harassment or attempt to spread terrorism. To decide the case according to law.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
