INSTITUTE OF COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANTS OF PAKISTAN versus GHULAM ABBAS
Reglns 11 (3) & 25 [as amended by notification section RO No. 1020 (I) / 2014, 12 11 2014] Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), appeal of Section 3 intra-court election dispute electoral rolls Regulation 25 of the Cost and Management Accountants Regulation, made after the issuance of the electoral schedule, was declared by the High Court Single Judge Ultra Virus, according to the constitutional jurisdiction, the choice of accuracy is extremely Was a skilled business in which prospective candidates were expected to market. Individual voters' ability to be elected to the position of offer was important and of the utmost importance that the candidates had the right to trust their candidacy and refer to the Electoral College members to cast their ballots. The purpose of the election schedule, which was announced by the Election Committee, was to make it clear in the elections so that the candidates could participate in the election uld be aware of the management and management of their election campaigns for the candidates. There was no scope to go or compete with a procedure that had not previously been amended in Regulation 25 of the Cost and Administrative Accountants Regulation 1990, which aimed to facilitate voters abroad but still had the rights of candidates. Had to be kept in mind and their loss cannot be attributed to any modification Which had the adverse effect of the candidates being re-elected. Election Campaigns Pakistan's election rules did not allow the modification of the electoral rolls when the election schedule was made. Election of the National Court Division Bench of the High Court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
