Sections 2 302 (b), 34, 96 96 and Q 97 assassination, joint intent, right to private defense, benefit of suspicion of value of evidence recommended in cross-section litigation, and complainant Doing the cross version, do not explain the death of the deceased in this case can only be emphasized so as to suspect the collateral case that in the post-mortem report of the victim, no injuries were reported. The firearm attributed to the suspect was not attributed to the weapon. The post-mortem report complained that the party, in a cross-version, attacked with deadly weapons and attacked freely between the parties, the responsibility of which was attributed to the two accused. It hurts. Special mitigating circumstances existed with the help of the doctor's opinion as the complaining party was accused of aggression, even in the absence of specific plea for the right to self-defense, it could be inferred by the court that The accused were accused of their right to self-defense and were provided protection under Sections 9 and 97, the PPC prosecution did not succeed in proving their case against the accused. Outside the shadows of reasonable doubt and legal defense, the accused was used by the accused and had not committed any crime, the convictions of all the accused were set aside and they took advantage of the doubt. They were acquitted of the charges.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
