Section 302/364/337 A / 148/149 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 417 Appeal against the motive of kidnapping, in clearing the delay of two and a half hours in reporting the matter to the police. Was unsuccessful. Witnesses denied, the defense version was presented under section 342, CRPC will have to be fully accepted by the accused, according to the defense version, the accused opened fire on the accused with a pistol. , Which injured her leg. He then loaded the second cartridge in his 12 bore pistol and got into custody with the defendant to protect himself and went in the attempt to snatch the pistol and was more likely to kill the dead defense version and with it the prosecution. Other evidence also supported this. Medical evidence appeared at the suspect's residence. Prosecutors were not present at the time. In the presence of the accused, the bee was hit in the presence of a fire arm and was pressed by Ann Prosecution, which shows that the victim was an assailant. ? The affected verdict was neither misleading, illegal, nor based on its erroneous misconduct, which resulted in the abortion of justice by the trial court, it was based solely on reasons and there was no arbitrary matter. Was. Appeal against the record for breach of false, deceptive or record-breaking interference with the accused's evil is accordingly dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
