Section 497 (5) and 498 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), sections 9 (c), 15 and 51 of the Prevention of Control of Drugs for Canceling Pre-arrest Bail Was arrested in a case under 9 (c). Section HO / Complainant's Applicant's Offerings were disclosed to the intoxicating Goods Act 1997 and were reported to be discharged, and he was acquitted on the charge that the inquiry further stated that Section HA had falsely implicated the applicant in the case of sedition. After the bail was approved with the defendants, the applicant filed for the cancellation of the bail granted to the defendants, there was enough material for linking the respondents to the commission of the offense, Is subject to the Prohibited Clause of Section 11 of the Content Control. Respondents of the Act, 1997, under the circumstances, that the police needed the innocence of the applicant for further investigation proved during the e-investigation and thereafter, he was acquitted of the charge, the first party proved that the export The alleged marijuana belongs to the respondents, no unlawful will or intention was found by the prosecution; the accused / respondents were not entitled to the pre-arrest bail exemption, which was an unusual relief order that was sent to Section H earlier. The arrest warrant was also illegal because the Special Judge ordered that the court should not arrest him without the permission of the bail. So if there were no bail orders. Recall, probes and more evidence against respondents to the investigating agency
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
