MST. ITRAT NAZIR versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER, EDUCATION DISTRICT BAHAWALPUR
Article 199 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Constitution Petition Civil Service Appellant filed a constitutional petition and directed that a letter of appointment be issued in his favor against the post of secondary school educator. Was denied. On the basis that his objectionable authority had not signed with the competent authority of the institution where he was already serving the appellant's constitutional application, he was rejected on the basis that he had already filed the petition. Had obtained a suitable remedy. In the present case the dispute regarding the accuracy of the District Coordination Officer was that the applicant's request was not as advertised and was not accompanied by any objection certificate (NOC) from the appointing authority of the institution where he was Was already serving. Secondary School) In addition to the obvious reduction in the acquisition of the NOC through the ost applicant and its poor certification when applying for advertiser P, the appellant used two Domosyl certificates for the same position at two different locations. Had applied. One for his or her residence and the other for his or her husband's residence cannot be appreciated by such practice in the appellant's part of the purchase. The law party, in its constitutional jurisdiction, referred to the High Court as fact. I have sought equitable relief and the party who did not approach the High Court with open hands was hardly deserving of any relief. Appellant did not approach the High Court with open hands; the intra-court appeal was dismissed. I
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
