Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus MST. ANSARUN NISA

Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Restitution Allowance Quantum Husband Has Distress With Regard To The Restitution Allowance Settled By The Courts Husband brought his pay slip to prove that he was receiving 2000 dirhams per month. But in his statement he confessed. As he owns property worth crores of rupees in Pakistan, which has shown his financial status, the care allowance rate set by the two courts below is for the plaintiffs to be daughters of the High Court. Not much for a reason, he refused to interfere with the jurisdiction of the Constitution. Decisions and orders passed by two courts below the petition were dismissed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• RAIS GUL MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH KHAN 2012 CLC 1379
• FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SARWAR LATIF ASSOCIATES 2012 CLD 1380
• LIAQAT HUSSAIN MALIK v. Malik MUHAMMAD ASLAM 2012 YLR 1386
• MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN 2012 CLC 1392
• ALI MUHAMMAD v. SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS AND MINORITIES AFFAIRS ISLAMABAD 2012 YLR 1401
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB v. AFTAB AHMAD 2012 PLC(CS) 1402
• SHAUKAT MEHMOOD v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary Agriculture 2012 CLD 1405
• Mst. ITRAT NAZIR v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER, EDUCATION DISTRICT BAHAWALPUR 2012 PLC(CS) 1405

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

power of attorney advocate Dina lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes