Find a Lawyer

RAJA MASOOD AHMAD versus ANSAF ALI

In filing an appeal for revision of sections 104 and 115, a party petitioner claimed that the defendant had filed an appeal before the Court of Appeal, which gave the applicant a wrong address and consequently The applicant was unreasonably condemned. Notice of filing an appeal before the Court of Appeal was never found, nor was there any knowledge of the aggravating proceedings, nor the decision of the petitioner's lawyer had passed away and the copy of the death certificate was kept on record, and the case was already admitted. Was taken For regular hearings, the trial court's failure to prosecute a statutory applicant on a technical basis cannot be ruled out. The applicant was seriously condemned and put aside the appellate court's decision and order and the case was remanded to the appellate court. Was accepted accordingly

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• Mst. ITRAT NAZIR v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER, EDUCATION DISTRICT BAHAWALPUR 2012 PLC(CS) 1405
• Mst. SAMEENA AKHTAR v. MUHAMMAD HANIF CHAUDHRY 2012 MLD 1405
• MUHAMMAD KAUSAR IQBAL v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE 2012 PCrLJ 1405
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. Mst. NASREEN AKHTAR 2012 CLC 1407
• MUHAMMAD ASGHAR v. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, PUNJAB 2012 MLD 1413
• IRSHAD AHMAD v. MANZOOR AHMAD 2012 YLR 1414
• HAQ NAWAZ v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER REVENUE (CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENTAL SELECTION COMMITTEE), JHANG 2012 PLC(CS) 1417
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB v. WAHID BAKHSH 2012 YLR 1418

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

us immigration advocates from Khandabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes