Find a Lawyer

SHAHNAZ AKHTAR versus RIAZ HUSSAIN

Section 8 distribution authority, the reclamation of the evidence was the joint ownership of both the lands and the plaintiffs tried to recover the possession on the basis of division of the land between them and the trial court granted the trial by the appellate court. ? During the evidence the judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff neither the plaintiffs exhibiting the distribution order nor displaying a copy of the daily proceedings with interest in their proceedings and neither did Tatima result in the partition. The plaintiffs map in favor of the plaintiffs relies more on Geomet. But this document was not signed by the Revenue Officer or any other authorized authority. Also, mutation entries were not countersigned by any authorized authority. In the editorial register, my entry had no sanction in the eyes of the law. The plaintiffs failed to prove that the suit land was divided. And the possession of the land was transferred to the foregoing in the interest of the plaintiff Judge and the order passed by the lower appellate court was set aside and the trial court was reinstated. The circumstances allowed review.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ alias PALU v. State 2012 YLR 358
• SHEHRI-CBE through General Secretary v. LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2012 PLD 362
• NADEEM HUSSAIN v. State 2012 MLD 362
• ANWAR SHAH v. Mst. FATIMA BIBI 2012 YLR 365
• SHABANA AKHTAR v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, BHAKKAR 2012 PLC(CS) 366
• Chaudhry MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. HABIB BANK LTD. 2012 PLD 370
• KAUSAR PARVEEN v. State 2012 MLD 374
• MUHAMMAD SALAH-UD-DIN v. NADRA 2012 PLD 378

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

ask a advocate free from Lower Dir lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes