Section 42 Title Fraud Proof Partners claims to own 1 / 3rd of the property in the possession of the plaintiffs who are in the interest of their predecessor and claim that the sale deeds and alterations in relation to the land are fraudulent. Were the result of The deceased's legal heirs, however, insisted that they did not own any piece of land, and the lower appellate court had dismissed the case and appeal, respectively. The legitimate plaintiff was the legal heir of the underprivileged owner while one of the defendants was the daughter of the deceased owner and the other was the brother of the defendant, who claimed himself to be the victim's general attorney in three districts of Punjab. Owner of real estate, who was ineligible, was a person, advanced age, paralysis, unable to walk, and suffered from chronic illness two years before his death, which he never sold. Eid did not appoint his father-in-law as his lawyer and all the alleged sales and power of attorney in favor of the defendant were the result of fraud, following the defendant's entry on the plaintiff's status, being the legal heir of the deceased owner. Subsequently, the plaintiff had become their respective shareholder and they were deemed to have considered the shares in the property suit, because to such an extent the two courts were against the law, the plaintiff successfully Proved his case and the victim's daughter is entitled to her share accordingly. Even if under the law, the sale process was declared an unlawful decision in his favor and the orders passed by both the courts were set aside and the case in favor of the defendants
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
