Section 13 Sue for Discrimination The plaintiff claims that he / she has a superior right to a pre-occupant / defendant in his / her capacity as a partner, on account of the stability of the land and The plaintiffs in the general passage declined in their written statement. The superior right of the preceding authorization, as well as the completion of the cases filed by the plaintiff by the plaintiff, were also excluded mainly because the plaintiff did not appear in the court as his own witness. And the trial court failed to meet the requirements of the plaintiff and the student-in-law against the decision of the court, even if a sale transaction was found in this case, to prove the fact that the plaintiff's court I did not present. A certain date, time and place and that they demanded urgently. For example, to prove that the facts are fatal to his case when the facts and circumstances of the knowledge of a party were not present before the court to prove that fact. Plaintiffs can be excluded from his non-appearance that the plaintiff could not give due and honorable reasons for failing to prove the fact of making the tabas because he did not appear in court and the plaintiff's witnesses did not say that the plaintiff was ill. Or he was unable to appear in court to defend his statements, which did not enter the witness room, nor can he prove that he had made the inquest nor that he was in any superior right. Suitland, his suit was rightly rejected by the lower courts
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
