Sections 302 (b) and 302 (c) Qatil Ahmed's testimony did not affect the credibility of the ocular witnesses The eyewitnesses did not provide any plausible explanation of their presence at the relevant time. At the time of the incident, the deceased's relatives had denied their statements. The prosecution's case was full of impossibilities and uncertainties that could not be reconciled with direct and truthful evidence by the complainant and other witnesses. Introduced brand new details from their first statements during. And the undisputed facts, which were detrimental to the prosecution's version, would be fully regarded without the scrutiny of the defendant's version, after the prosecutor's version, the defendant would see his real sister And confessed to the serious and sudden outrage of the incident under sudden provocation. In the barely objectionable case, its Paramor Nce version was far more convincing than the prosecution's version, under Section 230b (b) the perpetrator of the offenses was convicted; PPC consequently pursued Section 2302 (c). , Was converted under the PPC and sentenced to 14 years for two years under RI. Since the deceased was not innocent, his legal heirs were not entitled to any compensation under Section 4 544A, the appeal of the PC was dealt with accordingly. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
