A. XXXVII, 1r 2, 3 The suit for recovery of the money on the basis of the check was summoned through a public notice requesting leave for the defense of the defendant and the defendant filed a written statement and the court granted the defendant Was sued for the right to sue. Because it did not apply for a delay in filing a vacation for defense of the suit, the specific procedure for summary suit was determined under A. XXXVII, CPC notices and defendants. The summons was issued as if this is a normal recovery case. The amount of the money will be presented in a clarified form and in the sum form number, in all suits on bills of exchange, bill or promise notes, under the provisions of sub-rule 1, 2 of O. XXXVII, CPC. HOGC will not be guilty if the notice / summons were not issued on the prescribed form available in the CPC Schedule in the Annex \ B in the Schedule Max. No action T will not prejudice in any way), was completely engrossed in the justice management system to refer the trial court's written statement to the court and to achieve justice. The petition can be cited as a defense request, the writing was separated with a decree. With the statement filed by the defendant, the matter will be treated as a leave request to appear and defend, and in support of this, the defendants may file an affidavit \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
