Section 2 302 (b) conviction of Qatil Amad evidence, reduction of firearm injury was specifically supported by post-mortem report attributed to the defendant on the back of the victim's right shoulder, medical evidence confirmed by the Ocular Account. The eyewitnesses had no motive. The accused was falsely implicated in the case and remained constant on material points during the cross examination. During the trial, the court did not seriously challenge the accused's lawyer and demanded a reduction in his sentence, which happened before. The incident was not brought on record The motive for the incident could not be proved The prosecutor did not repeat the fire The prosecution's witnesses exaggerated the involvement of the other bad accused in the case while the accused's sentence was upheld. His death sentence was changed. Sentenced to life imprisonment under circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
