PRINCIPAL GOVERNMENT GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, SHAHDARA TOWN, LAHORE versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE
A XVIII, R 17 and O XLI, R 27 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Power of Court for the Recovery of a Petition Requesting the Court to Re-Appeal / Re-Appeal of the Witness, Right to Examine by the Applicant Two years later, the witness's request to re-call the witness, dismissed by trial court validity order XVIII, R 17, was an independent provision of the CPC law that led to the case being sent to the court before a final verdict. At any stage of the case, there was ample authority to re-call any witness. This suggestion can be further explained as before any matter can be dealt with, either party can present any witness or ask for any witness, such as in the initial stage when the list of witnesses was provided, when the evidence was recorded. Has been or at any time appealed or revised, as provided under OXLI, R 27, to the CPC courts submitting their jurisdiction under arbitration under arbitrary powers to provide justice to the parties. Is. Following the closure of the right to cross-examination, the nerve request as a review, which was not valid, the impugned orders of the courts below were set aside to re-seek the applicant's testimony as the judicial witness constitutional The request was allowed,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
