Defining the evidence related to Section 9 (c) drug possession and smuggling in the circumstances in which the intoxicant was found, he stated that the accused had been charged with 16kg of heroin, as he was known in the Chemical Examiner's report. It was not disclosed that the samples for the analysis report prepared by the Chemical Examiner of the eight persons were properly sent to the Office of Chemical Examiner, there was no legal value under the conditions set by the Chemical Examiner for reporting. Was not available on file, was the substance sent to the Chemical Examiner or not. The narcotic substance was suspected and neither the complainant nor the chemical executor had recorded anything that showed how the heroin was separated from the shampoo, which was added to the liquid in the bottles. In nature, not all of these deficiencies / lacunae were properly understood. / To be examined by the trial court, while convicting the accused, who termed the prosecutor's case extremely dubious, the prosecution failed to prove any suspicion beyond which the accused was charged. Has been terminated, under circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
