Sections 42 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OLXX, RR1 and 2, were simultaneously rejected by the plaintiff and the plaintiff's application for interim relief, and the appellate court's plaintiff against the construction. An order of restraint was sought by the plaintiff's review of a watercourse outlet on the plaintiff's property shows that no document stated that no shop was built in compliance with the unidentified orders. The request for was only to prevent the construction of the shop and in such case the outlet was constructed, the request was bound to fail To establish this fact, the first person, the defendant was bound to prove the alleged shoplifting in the proprietor's personal property, which the plaintiff failed to sue, the defendant dismissed on the assumption and without consultation. Appeal for interim relief for interim relief The plaintiff's request for interim relief was set aside by the High Court's orders and the case was remanded to the trial court, which was revised. ly r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
