PUNJAB AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPLIES CORPORATION versus UNITED BANK LTD.
0 VI, Rr 14, 15 & O XXIX, R 1 The suit authorized the corporation, the plaintiff plaintiff, to sue for collection of the money, but the trial court dismissed it on the ground that the plaintiff filed an article or memorandum association. The motion was not submitted to the Company to show that its Director Marketing had the authority to file a case and that the order passed by the trial court was issued by the Lower Appellate Court, Order VI, Rule 14, 15 and Order XXIX, Rule, 1 CPC were neither contradictory nor exclusive to each other, both provisions were interdependent and did they It should be read and interpreted by the Dawes that it would be easier for the litigants to press on the law for the advancement of justice; the two provisions should not be interpreted in a manner that avoids or threatens. Or complicate the law curriculum, and the itinerary for justice was signed and endorsed by Director Marketing and fulfilled the requirements of Order VI. And Order XXIX, Rule 1, CPC High Court set aside concurrent decisions and orders with the following two courts in exercise of the jurisdiction of the amendment and allowed the plaintiff to decide the case in favor of the plaintiff. Gone.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
