Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA

Article 13 Constitution of Pakistan Article 199 Constitutional Application The tenant's eviction on the basis of default in payment of rent is denied to the landlord and tenant tenant relationship on the ground that any relationship between landlord and tenant between the parties. does not exist. The rent controller found that the landlord and tenant relationship existed between the parties. ValidTeland owner had to relinquish the burden of proof through preliminary evidence of his relationship, after which the tenant rejected such evidence on record. In the present case, the defendant (the landlord) had proved that he was the landlord and paid the same on rent which led the petitioner (tenant) to the destroyed premises with credible and authentic evidence. Failed to establish his position, appellate court order was upheld Constitutional petition dismissed Was, in the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• TANVIR ISHAQ v. State 2012 YLR 451
• JAHAN KHAN NIAZI v. State 2012 MLD 452
• TAISEI CORPORATION v. A.M. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. 2012 PLD 455
• MUHAMMAD NADEEM v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BHAKKAR 2012 CLD 458
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE/JUSTICE OF PEACE, D.G. Khan 2012 YLR 460
• MUHAMMAD BABAR KHAN GHUMMAN v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2012 YLR 472
• MUSARRAT BIBI v. MUHAMMAD NAWAZ 2012 MLD 474
• M. AHMED SH. v. J.S.B. BANK LIMITED 2012 CLD 477

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

best advocate from Parachinar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes