MUHAMMAD BABAR KHAN GHUMMAN versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER
Section 420/406 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition A criminal violation of trust, petitioner of fraudulent FIR requested termination of FIR on the basis that the FIR was registered by the complainant. There is also a result of malpractice by the police and the police as well. The applicant did not commit any of the truth or lies of the allegations contained in the FIR, which can only be traced to the court of competent jurisdiction during the investigation or after filing a report under Section 173, CR PC. That is, the practice of eliminating the FIR through superior court, using constitutional jurisdiction, was not approved by the accused in the available treatment before the Investigation Officer to prove his innocence and to investigate. Upon completion, section 551 of the CRPC had to approach the competent officer of the investigating officer having powers. The investigating officer had to present the matter to the relevant magistrate. And the magistrate had the authority to exclude the accused in the case of his innocence under section 63 of the CCPC. If the magistrate finds the accused innocent, he shall have no right to the matter on Rule 24 7 of the Police Rules 1934. Will refuse to take it seriously. During the course of the inquiry, matters were available under the orders of the relevant magistrate for the accused who claim to be innocent who could get relief without going through the whole length of the investigation.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
