Find a Lawyer

MUSARRAT BIBI versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ

A suit for recovery of the Section 25 care allowance was pending before the Family Court, petitioning the petitioner to transfer the case to keep M on the ground that both parties now reside in their place and one Applicant hanging lady is facing difficulties in appearing in court. On the spot, the petitioner had obtained a previous order against the respondents and the petitioner's request for submission to the same court was present at the place where the decision was likely to be made within a short time. Will be done, the applicant has chosen himself. G and the court should not have obliged the applicant merely because he is no longer resident at the address given after the suit was filed. If the case was moved on the petition of the petition, no useful purpose could be served. Will Applicant for transfer of applicant, in circumstances dismissed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• MUHAMMAD NADEEM v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BHAKKAR 2012 CLD 458
• MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA 2012 MLD 459
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE/JUSTICE OF PEACE, D.G. Khan 2012 YLR 460
• MUHAMMAD BABAR KHAN GHUMMAN v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2012 YLR 472
• M. AHMED SH. v. J.S.B. BANK LIMITED 2012 CLD 477
• ABDUL HAQ and Legal Heirs v. MUHAMMAD SAJJAD 2012 PLD 480
• TARIQ MASIH alias BADSHAH v. State 2012 PCrLJ 482
• ARSHAD AHMAD alias M. ARSHAD v. MUHAMMAD YAR 2012 PLD 483

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

top advocate from Muzaffarabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes