Find a Lawyer

JAHAN KHAN NIAZI versus STATE

Section 517 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 337A (i) and 337A (ii) of the rifle's soon-to-be-participant in the High Court denying the accused's appeal after being sentenced by the trial court. All that was left now would be a separate trial on the fugitive and his arrest, and the property would have to be presented to the court at the time of trial. The accused could not claim the custody of the applicant's rifle, Section 517, Under CR, the matter was property. The PC had given the trial court's order to refuse the rifle's refusal to give its rifle, with reasonable grounds and no interference was sought by the High Court.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• ABDUL MAJEED v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, FAISALABAD 2012 PLD 445
• MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. SADAM ALI 2012 YLR 447
• UNION BANK LIMITED v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM FIAZ KHOKHAR 2012 CLD 451
• TANVIR ISHAQ v. State 2012 YLR 451
• TAISEI CORPORATION v. A.M. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. 2012 PLD 455
• MUHAMMAD NADEEM v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BHAKKAR 2012 CLD 458
• MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA 2012 MLD 459
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE/JUSTICE OF PEACE, D.G. Khan 2012 YLR 460

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

lawer from fb area from Kabir Wala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes