Section 2 (b) b Defendant of Qatil-ud-Aid evidence - The complainant and other witnesses of the prosecution were the original brothers and they were living in a case which was 40/5050 miles from the location of the incident. The business was not relevant in the history of the prosecution was highly unlikely, except that the two real brothers, no independent witnesses from the scene of the incident, were referred to strengthening the prosecutor's case, saying that two prosecution witnesses falsely accused It was my intention to get involved and their credibility was that the witnesses were not called to be suspicious. The enmity was admitted to the incident, first of all, a blind murder, but the accused was only involved in pressuring him and others to compromise on another murder, which involved two members of the complaining party, Imprisonment and life imprisonment were faced with punishment, medical evidence, full support for the ocular account was accepted by the parties, therefore, the purpose is not attributed to the forensic science laboratory suspect. What could have been, was negative and was deliberately withheld. The prosecution failed to bring the accused's crime home. He was. Beyond reasonable doubt, the accused was acquitted of the charge and ordered to be released in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
