MALIK MUHAMMAD SAMEEN KHAN versus RETURNING OFFICER
Section 14 (3) (c) and (5a) documents nomination, as properly stated in their statement of assets and liabilities to repay the loan amount received by the appellant of Zarai Tractical Bank Limited (ZTBL). Appellant was not charged by anyone but was not mentioned. The default was to default on any loan repayments, including loans from ZTBL Appellant and approximately information about such loans was provided and between the information provided by the appellant and information obtained from ZTBL. The slight difference of Rs, 000 could not be hidden. It is considered a defect in the conduct or nomination of his papers that the rejection of the papers nomination was a penalty provided for the commission of a crime or that a violation of certain clauses of the law would require a person to do something special with the masculine limb. Fines or wrongdoing can be fined. , What was missing in the present case, the High Court accepted the appeal and in the circumstances nominated the undesirable order
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
