Sections 498 and 497 (2) of the Control of Narcotic Substance Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) drug possession ad interim arrest warrant, further inquiry validation only allegations leveled against the accused allegedly provided to the complainant. Detectives revolve around (policeman) FIR contents uncovering an unusually detailed and precise indication, which can only be considered as a valuable piece of evidence, the prosecution's witnesses told the detective. Regarding the fact of recovery, under Section 161, CR PC, did not say a word in its statements. In the terms stated by the complaint, and in no way did they mention anything about the culprit's guilt, the previous FIR was registered at the request of a widow (the daughter-in-law of the accused), in which the police There were allegations against the officials. The same allegation was closely related to the widow's husband where the present FIR was lodged, and false accusations of the accused cannot be ruled out in the present case between the accused and the police officers in the background of the previous investigation. Had requested that the accused be involved in similar cases in the past, but he failed to identify any relevant evidence against the accused. The present case was considered under section 497 (2). Further investigation into the crime of CRPC was allowed, application was allowed on CRPC bail and their bail pre-arrested. Confirmed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
