Find a Lawyer

NAVEED MERCHANT versus SAFDAR GONDAL

OI, R10 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 73 Violation of the Contracting Suit for Compensation and Compensation The trial court's request of the plaintiff required or appropriate to show his name as the defendant in this case Was deleted The basis of the oral agreement between him and the other defendant and no specific role in the plaintiff against the plaintiff was mentioned. Was the advisor. Compensation for breach of contract can be claimed by a party who violated the terms of the contract. A person who was not a party to the contract was neither required nor competent in the case of damages to the appropriate party. The decision was allowed to validate the defendant's request to show his name as a defendant on one side of the trial court's order and the defendant's name, y

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB v. WAHID BAKHSH 2012 YLR 1418
• RUQIA BIBI v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, MIANWALI 2012 PLC(CS) 1419
• ASGHAR ALI v. MUHAMMAD YOUSAF 2012 YLR 1422
• ARIF MUMTAZ v. State 2012 CLC 1424
• Hafiz MUHAMMAD ALEEM v. LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2012 YLR 1426
• SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE LIMITED through General Manager v. ABDUL HAMEED 2012 CLD 1428
• KARAM ELLAHI v. Mst. ZAITOON BIBI WIDOW 2012 MLD 1431
• Dr. SAIMA MALIK v. CAPITAL CITY POLICE OFFICER, LAHORE 2012 PCrLJ 1433

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

advocate for immigration from Sheikhupura lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes