O XVII, R 3 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 Suit Closing the right to present evidence at a defense strike for the specific performance of the contract, the lawsuit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed on 8, 2009 In this case, the trial court held that despite repeated opportunities, the plaintiff failed to present any evidence to support his case. 6 On 2009, neither the plaintiff nor his lawyer or himself appeared in the trial court and only one of the attorneys was presented by a lawyer without any assignment. The reasons for disqualification for the preparation of evidence were that the plaintiff should have had some responsibility and wanted to produce evidence, followed by three successive delays in the payment of costs and the submission of evidence after the approval of the last and last opportunity. The claimant is excluded from claiming an improper error for. The right to prove his argument was adjusted on three consecutive dates of the hearing so that he could not say what the court should have done to allow the High Court presiding officer an extraordinary leave, a trial on the trial. Appeal for hearing is dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
