Article 11 and the Fourth Schedule Criminal Code (v. 1898), Sections 154 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Protection of Detention, Significant Recovery of Judicial Review To a large extent, the District Coordination Officer on the basis of detention on this basis. Directed that they have activities. Prior to public peace, the independence of a judicial citizen, protected by law, was protected by the constitution; the High Court had to protect and protect the rights guaranteed primarily by being the guardian of the constitution. There was no reason for the detention orders that justified the detention, nor was there any material on the record. The orders of the Syed did not even touch the plea raised by the detente evidence. Was to be built on the basis of speculation because the theory of speculation could not be satisfied with the subjective Was high and if there was no objective satisfaction then the court concluded that the grounds mentioned in the detention orders were not supported by the appropriate material but would have prevented the High Court from exercising judicial review powers. I was not something that should be materialized through scrutiny. Should establish that the detention order was properly approved, the detention authority needed to establish each detention on the basis of the content sufficient to justify its order. If the content in the section disappears, the entire detention order will be terminated. During the extension of the detention order, nothing was mentioned by the detention authority
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
