Section 2 (2 (b) / Q 34) Khalil Amr, exporting weapons from a complimentary intention evidence room, which was raided and searched multiple times, was highly suspected and it was learned that the last date was also On physical remand, if any of the witnesses who testified did not come forward to prove the alleged recovery of the weapon, he would be suspected the motorcycle was allegedly recovered from the house garden. Was not in working condition, had been raided several times before, owned by the accused's father and not in his special possession. The motorcycle was owned by the motorcycle, it was not known the motorcycle suspect was not proven and the prosecution witnesses said that the investigating officer recovered four small but his report was reported by the forensic science laboratory Eight vacancies were submitted to the laboratory office and they said that the eight vacancies coincided with the test, which showed that vacancies were prepared in such a case as the prosecution for the recovery of weapons of crime. Reasonable suspicion arose in connection with the version, both of the prosecution's witnesses admit He had long enmity with the accused and other members of his family. , Must be examined with great care and care. The trigger was a dual weapon. This can be a trigger for the commission of the crime, and at the same time a reason for contradicting the medical evidence and false analogies in the account, to identify the suspected and untrusted report of the Franz Science Laboratory It was enough that the accused
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
