Section 2 (2 (b) / Q 34) The plaintiff's definition of general intent evidence did not bring the prosecution's record of how the defendants arrived at the scene of the incident and dismissed the prosecution's evidence against the defendants. The standard of witnesses was to such an extent that it required strong co-operation, if it were to be believed, in the present case, no collusion was made as any of the accused No weapons were recovered from the attack, and the purpose was not to believe that all circumstances had left a skeptical mind about the suspect's involvement. There were doubts that the prosecution needed to prove its case beyond any doubt, and if any suspicion was raised in the prosecution's case, the accused would not be benefitted as a matter of grace. , But because of the suspicion of nature, a true story of the prosecution was attributed to the accused, the controversial verdict was set aside, the accused acquitted and released, under circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
