OVI, R 17 and Schedules, Annexes A Serial No. 47 and 48 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), sections 42 and 54 of the suit filed by the plaintiffs were dismissed by the trial court and during the possibility of appeal. Was deleted The lower appellate court dismissed the request before the lower appellate court filed a petition for modification of the prayer and added only a prayer for the interpretation of the specific performance of the contract as a request for verification in the application verification request. Cannot allow because the defendants in this case did not necessarily have the sanctions. According to Appendix A to Serial Nos. 4 and 48, the fact of preparation and willingness according to the types of applications listed in the schedule was not confirmed during the evidence in the CPC and the sales contract, only by the proposed amendment to prayer. The changes in the body showed its usefulness. Plaintiffs were deprived of their property by the defendants they purchased for valuable consideration, as such amendments to the Proposal were inconsistent with the contents of the Plaintiffs and would not allow Plaintiffs to substitute proceedings. Cannot be allowed so that the defendants' rights to purchase the suit property are denied by the High Court to interfere with the trial court and the decisions made under the O Courts. , R 17, CPC was rightfully dismissed Under the circumstances revision was rejected
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
