MUHAMMAD QAYYUM versus HAQ NAWAZ DOGAR THROUGH DR. ALI NAQI
A XXXII, R 4, Sections 12 (2) and 114 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Appointment of a court officer as guardian ad for the specific performance of a Section 12 suit agreement Negligence Proof Petitioners (Minors) of the duty guardian's ad rank filed a petition under Sections 12 (2) and 114 CPC, claiming that the guardian ad designated by the trial court was acting in the discharge of his duties. Was unsuccessful and this order was obtained by practicing fraud with the court, and the trial court, after hearing the parties, summarized the case. He dismissed the case that the convictions taken by the minors were that the appointment of the Guardian ad was against the law because the applicant / minor's mother is alive and the trial court did not ask the mother for it, and This guardian ad / court readership failed to defend the juvenile in connection with the specific performance of the agreement by not examining both witnesses. Respondents pleaded that the court had issued notice to the minor's mother, but she could not appear and the court was obliged to set a guardian ad limitation under A XXXII, R 4, CPC where no relationship. The plaintiff or the appropriate person was not available, and that read the present petitions under section 12 (2), with section 114, the CPC was not enforceable because the minor was obliged to file an appeal; it did not appear to be valid. It may be that the trial court made a serious effort to obtain the personal attendance of minors. Mother Guardian's advertisement for deportation against minors John witnesses
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
