GHULAM SARWAR KHAN versus CHAIRMAN PUNJAB BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION
Applicants through the Board of Technical Education Application for the Amendment of Arts 199 and 10A Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VI, R 17 General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 21 Constitution Petition Associate Engineer's Diploma The constitutional petition issued to the jurisdiction request to remind the diplomat to cancel the order that he was not affiliated with the proceedings while passing an unauthorized order from the Board of Technical Education and recommended in the application clause. The unauthorized validation was not modified. The constitutional petition and its relief will affect the court. The court may allow an amendment request at any time when the applicant passed the instructional program in mechanical technology in session 1973 for three years, following an inquiry after 75 years of matriculation. The committee was constituted and the Bachelor's degree was issued. The applicant was not disputed and only the result of the 4th and 6th semesters stated that the diploma was questioned by the board and the High Court had sought the tabulation register. Was examined but no writ was accepted, the proceedings against the applicant were anti-corruption In the previous investigation was recommended by deleting. The Prima facie de novo inquiry of the Department can be termed as political exclusion because the authority was able to pass an order under section 21 of the General Clause Act, 1897, but was able to bring it back / recall it, however That was not true but was subject to certain limitations when an organization. Announcing any result, it could not remember exactly what caused the function to become opioid and not apply.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
