Section 21C Explosives Substance Act (VII of 1908), Section 5 Law Testimony (10 of 1984), Article 40 Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 397 Terrorism Training and Explosion Recovery Testimony Revealed Immediately after the FIR police witnesses, the evidence of the accused was sentenced by the trial court and they were sentenced to 14 years imprisonment, which was ordered to run continuously within a short period of thirty minutes. R was registered and the complainant not only named all the accused persons but also mentioned the material fact of each minor as well as the events that took place in it. , Which did not exclude the possibility of deliberations or consultations on false accusations of the prosecution which successfully proved the case against the accused, who was caught red-handed and possessing large quantities of material. Was used for the manufacture of explosives There was no element of suspicion available from the prosecution's witnesses who affected the trust and nothing was found on the record which could prove that the witnesses had witnessed the previous riots, Ousted against the accused due to malicious or malicious intent, and to prevent them from being trapped or LRC that evidence was not only to indicate on their recovery has been identified. The data obtained from the accused at the time of his arrest but from his laptop also reinforced the prosecution's claim that the accused were planning to commit extrahuman acts in the form of terrorist attacks. The High Court approved the trial court. Refused to interfere with the sentencing and punishment. The same High Court sentenced
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
