Section 13 Civil Code (v. 1908), Section 11 Tenants' eviction based on eviction, and the use of premises for purposes other than that for which the tenant reserves the property of the landlord and tenant through Reset Judita. Relationships were denied (ground) for exclusion of evidence after which second and third eviction applications were again excluded due to a bar created by the Court of Justice Rule. ? The appellant believed that the basis for the subsequent application was not made in the earlier discharge application, so the Section 14 Ordinance does not apply and that the refusal of the relationship by the tenant is a deliberate act. The request was. The appellant was obliged to establish a relationship between the landlord and the tenant, as the controller was given jurisdiction to proceed in this case; in the present case, the appellant failed to do so, despite numerous opportunities. Appellant had to establish a relationship, then he may have emphasized that the field available to him, therefore, the withdrawal requests filed by the appellant could not be considered and this argument could not be argued. It may be stated that the Rent Controller had approved the monthly rental deposit under Section 13 (6) of the Ordinance. But it was revised on its own that it had no control. Do this; it was therefore unstable that where a particular jurisdiction was not granted by a particular law, then the general principles fall into the authority under which the authority to pass an order and that too. Wow
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
