Section 173 (3) Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/109/34 Constitution of Pakistan, Article I99 Constitutional Petition Qutil Am, Police, Joint Intent Magistrate's authority to exclude an accused on the basis of police opinion / report The authorizing suspect was named in the FIR, especially because of the deadly fire that the alleged motive of the incident in the victim's skull was a marriage dispute. The magistrate asked the suspect (defendant) at the request of the investigating officer. Was discharged. Argued that the magistrate did not take into account the appropriately dispensable material produced by the prosecution that the accused committed suicide, there was no possibility of expulsion from the FIR immediately after the correction, the victim The death was confirmed in a post-mortem report. Defendant's version developed by the accused was not supported by any independent witness in the defendant's version, the location investigating officer declared the accused innocent on the basis of the defendant's statement and some confidential information. There was no reason to deny the statements of the witnesses who allegedly supported the complainant's version. The felony charge took place in a sitting (baithak) organized by the accused for the crime and the victim's body was recovered from the same place. The magistrate agreed with the police opinion on the basis of mere speculation. And put forward the opinion of the police officer, seemingly arbitrary and disingenuous, the ban on the magistrate's Iplus application was not due to the controversy of the police; the unclean order of the magistrate was set aside, as directed. As well as this report 5 17
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
