NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN versus TREND HOSIERY (PVT.) LTD.
Section & bank 10 suits for bank loan recovery Plaintiff's claim of new facts to defend this defense was that it was merely a claim that he had the opportunity to refute the claim. Not the duplicate claims, as the claimant has annexed. There was no sanction for resubmitting the copy of the new document, which has been substantiated, and the defendant was not allowed to reject its contents; the court should consider its costs. The plaintiff, if any, may be charged to the plaintiff for having the documents excluded from the statements. In addition to cash finance accounts and first entries, there were many other entries in which all the transfer entries were made, nor did the plaintiff nor his entries specify such entries for which to record the evidence. Of course, the High Court granted unconditional leave to defendants' case. In the circumstances it was allowed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
